AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Postgresql replace example12/12/2023 Many attempted solutions to this problem fail to consider rollbacks, so they result in incomplete updates. Whenever practical you should queue up work and do a bulk upsert as described below instead. The function won't work correctly if triggers or secondary unique keys cause unique violations. ![]() It will only work in READ COMMITTED mode and is only safe if it's the only thing you do in the transaction, though. It guards against lost updates and insert races, unlike most naive solutions. The PostgreSQL documentation contains a useful procedure that'll let you do this in a loop inside the database. Using individual row upserts in a retry loop is the reasonable option if you want many connections concurrently trying to perform inserts. Locking the table and doing batch merge.Individual insert/update operations in a retry loop or.In general you must choose between two options: This article discusses the problem in useful detail. PostgreSQL doesn't have any built-in UPSERT (or MERGE) facility, and doing it efficiently in the face of concurrent use is very difficult. If you're on 9.5 and don't need to be backward-compatible you can stop reading now. The commit adding the feature is here and the discussion around its development is here. Unlike the solutions for 9.4 and older that are given below, this feature works with multiple conflicting rows and it doesn't require exclusive locking or a retry loop. upsert.įor usage see the manual - specifically the conflict_action clause in the syntax diagram, and the explanatory text. ON CONFLICT (key) DO UPDATE (and ON CONFLICT (key) DO NOTHING), i.e. These techniques are also useful for "insert if not exists, otherwise do nothing", i.e. This topic is discussed extensively at Insert, on duplicate update in PostgreSQL?, but that's about alternatives to the MySQL syntax, and it's grown a fair bit of unrelated detail over time. Crucially, any approach must be safe in the presence of multiple transactions working on the same table - either by using explicit locking, or otherwise defending against the resulting race conditions. That's what people are talking about when discussing an upsert. ![]() (2, 'Joe'), - Changed value of existing tuple Now imagine that you want to "upsert" the tuples (2, 'Joe'), (3, 'Alan'), so the new table contents would be: (1, 'fred'), INSERT INTO testtable (id, somedata) VALUES Given that PostgreSQL doesn't support it directly (before pg 9.5), how do you do this? Consider the following: CREATE TABLE testtable ( ON DUPLICATE UPDATE and the standard supports as part of the MERGE operation. A very frequently asked question here is how to do an upsert, which is what MySQL calls INSERT.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |